|
Patent search engine and patent informatics company PatentCafe
announces the launch of its Patent Factor Index Report (PF/i),
an online patent analysis tool that evaluates the Legal, Commercial
and Technological quality and valuation indicators of an issued
patent.
Used for investment and acquisition due diligence, to support
product strategies, help establish licensing value, or to evaluate
infringement litigation risk, the PF/i Reports provide a fast, reliable
overall assessment of a patent’s strengths and weaknesses.
The computerized report, which uses the company’s human-like Latent
Semantic Analysis patent search engine, is a significant advancement
for computer-based patent evaluation. The PF/I reports are an affordable
alternative to the hand-researched patent reports that consulting
firms charge thousands of dollars for. The PF/I Reports may even
outperform humans since the semantic engine, which searches nearly
3 million US patents, finds highly relevant patents that even the
most skilled patent searchers miss.
The PF/I Report, the latest addition to PatentCafe’s quickly expanding
line of patent informatics solutions, performs dozens of calculations
for each patent being evaluated. The reports also integrate with
the recently introduced ICO Patent Portfolio Manager, and ICO Patent
Competitive Intelligence Alerts.
Sneak previews of the solution have already found favor with university,
venture capital, patent licensing, and Fortune 500 executives, as
well as intellectual property consulting organizations – and for
good reason: the reports perform in about a minute as much as a
patent professional can accomplish in a few days.
Andy Gibbs, the company’s CEO notes: “during the 1960s, patent
counts and frequency of occurrence of certain patent indicators
were proven as reliable statistical predictors of economic, legal
and technological behaviors of patents. We believe our PF/i Reports
are the single most comprehensive patent evaluation modeling tool
ever made commercially available”.
The PF/i Report is the first to combine over 50 years of collective
work on proven patent data modeling by renowned economists, mathematicians
and researchers, including Criscuolo, Hall, Jaffe, Trajtenberg Reitzig
Schankerman, Lanjouw, the seminal work of Griliches and Scherer,
as well as PatentCafe’s own innovation analysis model introduced
in 1996.
With 85% of the market cap of the Fortune 500 companies attributable
to intangible assets, being able to value, or evaluate patents is
no longer a luxury, but a must. But computerizing patent analysis
is tough. Gibbs says “the few patent reports currently available
compute a total ‘score’ or ‘rating’. Single scores distort the real
world analysis that demands separate consideration of the three
core patent value components: the Legal, Commercial, and Technological
factors.”
Over the past few years, critics have argued that the US Patent
and Trademark Office has issued thousands of poor quality patents
that should never have been issued in the first place. An example
is Smucker’s recent patent number 6,004,596 for a crustless peanut
butter and jelly sandwich.
The Patent Factor Index Report for the ‘596 patent scored a “zero”
for patent validity of the PB&J patent because of the more than
100 closely related patents it identified while computing the report.
One of the relevant prior art patents cited by the PF/i report was
Little Caesar’s 1995 pizza pocket patent no. 5,756,137, “Method
for preparing a [stuffed] baked dough food product”.
The Smucker’s patent scored well in the PF/i Commercial Factors
section, and indeed Smucker’s sales of its PB&J “Uncrustables” has
been sweet. But making a “GO” investment decision based on commercial
scores alone, without assessing the corresponding Legal risks or
Technology value, can be a misuse of the company’s time and money.
“The bottom line”, says Gibbs, “is that the PF/I report shows that
the crustless PB&J may be a profitable slice of Smucker’s business
pie, but as the Patent Office and critics attest, the technological
value may not rise to the level of patentability. Our new reports
empower non-patent professionals to get an excellent perspective
on a patent’s value in just minutes.”
Using proven models such as multivariate regression, econometric,
citation and bibliometric analysis of patents that analyze large
data sets of patent indicators, the PF/i reports analyze the three
critical indicators to help determine “value’. The final report
provides more than a patent score, it provides backup information
such as a list of potential patent licensees for the patent portfolio
manager, and lists of closely related patents that litigators may
use for invalidity defense in a patent infringement suit.
The PF/I reports, more than 10 pages long, even provide insight
on the patent’s ability to withstand an opposition (such as invalidity
attempts against it), and predict the likelihood of a patent being
the subject of a patent lawsuit.
Individual PF/i Reports for any US patent issued since 1976 may
be purchased online for under $300. Analysts, litigators and Biz
Dev managers may obtain unlimited licenses to PF/i Reports by contacting
PatentCafe.
|